Sat, Oct 31, 2026 |Jumada I 21, 1448
Dubai Fajr 5:02 AM Dhuhr 12:02 PM Asr 3:16 PM Maghrib 5:39 PM Isha 7:09 PM
☀️ 31°C Dubai · Clear
Era News Gulf

UAE · Multi Language News Magazine

1 AED
= PKR 75.36
= INR 25.89
= BDT 33.80
= USD 0.272
= GBP 0.203
LATEST
Crime

Dubai Court Orders Husband and Son to Pay Dh16.1 Million for Jewelry Theft

A Dubai court has mandated a husband and son to pay Dh16.1 million after stealing jewelry and cash from the man's wife.

Dubai Court Orders Husband and Son to Pay Dh16.1 Million for Jewelry Theft

A Dubai court has ruled that a husband and his son must pay Dh16.1 million to the man's wife following the theft of valuable items from her home during a marital dispute.

The Dubai Court of First Instance ordered the pair to jointly reimburse Dh15.1 million, representing the value of the stolen gold and diamond jewelry, luxury watches, and cash. Additionally, they were required to pay Dh1 million in compensation for the financial and emotional harm caused to the wife.

Court documents revealed that the theft occurred amid ongoing marital disagreements. The husband and son took more than 100 pieces of gold and diamond jewelry, luxury watches, and cash, with the total value of the stolen items estimated at Dh15.1 million.

The case was initially heard in a criminal court, where both men were convicted of theft and sentenced to one year in prison each. They were also fined Dh15.1 million collectively, matching the value of the stolen property. The Court of Appeal later upheld these convictions.

Civil Lawsuit and Compensation

Following the criminal proceedings, the wife filed a civil lawsuit seeking Dh50 million in damages. She argued that the theft not only deprived her of valuable possessions but also caused significant psychological distress.

The wife claimed that gold prices had risen by at least 70 percent since the theft, resulting in an estimated loss of potential profits of approximately Dh11 million. She also requested around Dh23.9 million for emotional and moral damages, citing the betrayal by her husband and son.

The civil court acknowledged the defendants’ responsibility for the theft, as established by the criminal judgment, and focused on determining appropriate damages. It recognized that the wife had been deprived of her valuables and the opportunity to benefit from them for over 18 months. The court also noted the psychological distress and inconvenience she endured during the legal process.

However, the court dismissed the claim for anticipated profits from the increase in gold prices, stating compensation should be based on actual damages rather than hypothetical gains. Consequently, the court ordered the husband and son to pay Dh15.1 million for the stolen items and Dh1 million for material and moral damages, totaling Dh16.1 million. The remaining claims were rejected.